KEY FINDINGS: Authors report a prospective study involving children that showed overestimation of saturation by pulse oximetry that was attributable to skin tone. This overestimation could lead to undertreatment of hypoxemia and contribute to racial inequities in outcomes. Additional studies are needed in populations with a greater proportion of persons with darker skin tone. The findings emphasize that current FDA guidance for pulse-oximeter validation (https://www.fda.gov/media/72470/download?attachment), which recommends only limited involvement of persons with darkly pigmented skin without a formal definition, is inadequate in ensuring equity in pulse-oximetry accuracy. New guidance is currently under consideration. On the basis of these results, there is potential for improvement in both bias and precision.
BACKGROUND: Findings from the Pulse Oximetry and Skin Tone in Children (POSTer-Child) study were published February 12, 2025 in a letter to the editor of The New England Journal of Medicine. First author Joseph Starnes, MD, MPH, is a fellow in Pediatric Cardiology.
DETAILS: Retrospective studies have shown overestimation of oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry in adult and pediatric patients from races that may be associated with darker skin. These retrospective studies share key limitations, including race as a poor surrogate for skin tone and paired measurements of oxygen saturation as assessed by pulse oximetry (SpO2) and of arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) in the medical record. Limited prospective laboratory-based and clinical studies that used measured skin tone in adults have shown worse pulse-oximeter performance among patients with darker skin than among those with lighter skin. Very few prospective studies have involved children.
In the Pulse Oximetry and Skin Tone in Children (POSTer-Child) study, authors enrolled 320 patients younger than 21 years of age undergoing cardiac catheterization in 2024. Skin tone was measured with the use of a spectrophotometer. SpO2 was recorded with the use of two pulse oximeters (Nellcor and Masimo) at the exact time of blood sampling for measurement of fractional saturation by co-oximetry. Pulse-oximetry bias (SpO2-SaO2), precision (standard deviation of bias), and accuracy root mean square error (ARMS) were calculated (for all three measures, higher values indicate worse pulse-oximeter performance), as was the percentage of patients with occult hypoxemia (SaO2 of <88% when SpO2 is >=92%). Additional methodologic details are provided in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org. The population was similar to the U.S. population but showed relative underrepresentation of Hispanic children. A total of 48 of 319 patients (15.0%) identified as Black, and 44 (13.8%) identified as Hispanic.
Average bias was 1.32 percentage points for the Nellcor device and 1.88 percentage points for the Masimo device. Bias was higher among children with darker skin (individual typology angle [ITA] category 5 or 6) than among those with lighter skin (ITA category 1 or 2) for both pulse oximeters (P<0.001). Precision and ARMS were also higher for children with darker skin. ARMS was substantially higher than the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cutoff of three for children in ITA category 5 or 6. Occult hypoxemia was present in 4 of 56 children (7%) in ITA category 5 or 6 for the Nellcor device and in 5 of 60 children (8%) for the Masimo device, as compared with 0 of 81 children and 3 of 88 children (3%), respectively, in ITA category 1 or 2.
Copyright © Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
Source: Starnes, J., Welch, W., Henderson, C. C., et al. (2024). Pulse Oximetry and Skin Tone in Children. NEJM. 2025; 392: 1033-1034; Published: February 17, 2025. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2414937.
KEY FINDINGS: In this phase II study, azacitidine, venetoclax, and gilteritinib produced high remission rates and encouraging long-term survival in patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated AML who were unfit for intensive chemotherapy. The 3-year RFS and OS rates were 43% and 46%, respectively, although outcomes were less favorable in patients with FLT3-ITD mutations and baseline RAS pathway mutations. Most evaluable relapses were FLT3-negative, suggesting that resistance may involve mechanisms beyond persistent FLT3-mutated disease. Dose or duration reductions were frequently required during consolidation, primarily reflecting the challenge of managing myelosuppression. Randomized studies are needed to establish the role of this triplet regimen relative to current standard approaches.
BACKGROUND: Relapse after frontline azacitidine and venetoclax remains a major challenge in patients with FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with relapse often associated with expansion of FLT3-mutated clones. This phase II study evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of adding the FLT3 inhibitor gilteritinib to azacitidine and venetoclax in adults with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated AML who were considered unfit for intensive chemotherapy.
DETAILS: Thirty patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated AML were treated with the azacitidine, venetoclax, and gilteritinib triplet regimen. The median age was 71 years, and 22 (73%) patients had FLT3-ITD mutations. Fourteen patients (47%) proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in first remission. The median follow-up was 41.5 months.
The complete remission or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery rate was 96%. Eleven patients (37%) subsequently relapsed, and among evaluable relapses, the FLT3 mutation was no longer detectable in 67%, indicating that relapse mechanisms were not necessarily driven by persistent FLT3-mutated disease.
The median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 23.4 months and median overall survival (OS) was 29.7 months. At 3 years, RFS was 43% and OS was 46%. Among patients with FLT3-ITD-mutated AML, median RFS and OS were 17.0 months and 21.8 months, respectively, with 3-year RFS and OS rates of 32% and 36%. Baseline RAS pathway mutations were associated with poorer outcomes.
Survival outcomes were similar regardless of whether patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in first remission. Among patients receiving at least one consolidation cycle, 68% required a reduction in the dose or duration of at least one study drug, highlighting the need to manage treatment-related myelosuppression during prolonged therapy.
Copyright © Skyscape. All rights reserved.
Source: Short, N. J., Kantarjian, H. M., Daver, N., et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Azacitidine, Venetoclax and Gilteritinib in Newly Diagnosed FLT3-Mutated AML. Blood Advances.. 2026; 10(17): 5743–5750. Published: May 27, 2026. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2026019841.
[Posted 2/Sep/2026]
AUDIENCE: Hematology, Oncology
KEY FINDINGS: In this phase II study, azacitidine, venetoclax, and gilteritinib produced high remission rates and encouraging long-term survival in patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated AML who were unfit for intensive chemotherapy. The 3-year RFS and OS rates were 43% and 46%, respectively, although outcomes were less favorable in patients with FLT3-ITD mutations and baseline RAS pathway mutations. Most evaluable relapses were FLT3-negative, suggesting that resistance may involve mechanisms beyond persistent FLT3-mutated disease. Dose or duration reductions were frequently required during consolidation, primarily reflecting the challenge of managing myelosuppression. Randomized studies are needed to establish the role of this triplet regimen relative to current standard approaches.
BACKGROUND: Relapse after frontline azacitidine and venetoclax remains a major challenge in patients with FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with relapse often associated with expansion of FLT3-mutated clones. This phase II study evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of adding the FLT3 inhibitor gilteritinib to azacitidine and venetoclax in adults with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated AML who were considered unfit for intensive chemotherapy.
DETAILS: Thirty patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated AML were treated with the azacitidine, venetoclax, and gilteritinib triplet regimen. The median age was 71 years, and 22 (73%) patients had FLT3-ITD mutations. Fourteen patients (47%) proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in first remission. The median follow-up was 41.5 months.
The complete remission or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery rate was 96%. Eleven patients (37%) subsequently relapsed, and among evaluable relapses, the FLT3 mutation was no longer detectable in 67%, indicating that relapse mechanisms were not necessarily driven by persistent FLT3-mutated disease.
The median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 23.4 months and median overall survival (OS) was 29.7 months. At 3 years, RFS was 43% and OS was 46%. Among patients with FLT3-ITD-mutated AML, median RFS and OS were 17.0 months and 21.8 months, respectively, with 3-year RFS and OS rates of 32% and 36%. Baseline RAS pathway mutations were associated with poorer outcomes.
Survival outcomes were similar regardless of whether patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in first remission. Among patients receiving at least one consolidation cycle, 68% required a reduction in the dose or duration of at least one study drug, highlighting the need to manage treatment-related myelosuppression during prolonged therapy.
Copyright © Skyscape. All rights reserved.
Source: Short, N. J., Kantarjian, H. M., Daver, N., et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Azacitidine, Venetoclax and Gilteritinib in Newly Diagnosed FLT3-Mutated AML. Blood Advances.. 2026; 10(17): 5743–5750. Published: May 27, 2026. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2026019841.
KEY FINDINGS: Across five experimental studies, AI educational services were associated with greater guilt, lower perceived value, and, in several conditions, less willingness to recommend the approach compared with direct parental engagement. The findings indicate that reluctance to use AI for children's education may be linked less to perceptions of AI capability and more to the belief that educating one's children is a parental responsibility. The study also suggests that framing AI use as necessary because of an individual's limitations, or demonstrating that other parents use AI services, may improve positive WOM toward these services.
BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) educational services are increasingly positioned as tools that can assist children with learning and tutoring. However, the decision to use these services may be influenced by more than their perceived educational capability. This research examined how choosing AI educational services rather than direct parental involvement affects guilt, perceived value, and willingness to recommend the approach to others. Across five experimental studies, the investigators also examined whether perceived parental responsibility, intrinsic reasons for using AI, and conformity influence these responses.
DETAILS: The research used experimental designs comparing parental engagement with AI educational services across homework and writing-tutoring scenarios. Study 1a included 191 participants after exclusion of 9 cases; Study 1b included 200 participants; Study 2 included 200 participants; Study 3 included 390 participants; and Study 4 included 400 participants. Participants were recruited through the Credamo online platform.
In Study 1a, participants who considered using AI educational services reported greater guilt and assigned a lower monetary valuation than those who personally tutored their children. Mean guilt scores were 2.74 (SD 1.81) with AI educational services versus 2.09 (SD 1.58) with parental engagement (t=2.67, p=.008). Mean valuation was 1219.31 (SD 1154.32) versus 2097.99 (SD 2217.96), respectively (t=3.41, p=.001).
Study 1b reproduced these findings without using pictures and after accounting for parental status. Guilt was higher with AI educational services than with parental engagement (5.23 [SD 2.94] vs 3.79 [SD 2.47]; F(1, 198)=14.07, p<.001, ηp2=.07). Valuation was lower with AI educational services (1219.62 [SD 1581.27] vs 2494.11 [SD 2530.90]; F(1, 198)=18.24, p=.001, ηp2=.08).
Study 2 extended the analysis to willingness to recommend the educational approach. Participants using AI educational services reported greater guilt, lower valuation, and lower word-of-mouth (WOM) intentions than participants engaging in education themselves. Among participants with children, guilt means were 3.09 (SD 2.35) for AI educational services and 2.32 (SD 2.31) for parental engagement (F=4.18, p=.043, ηp2=.03). Valuation was 477.83 (SD 547.20) versus 968.14 (SD 780.09), respectively (F=21.14, p<.001, ηp2=.12), while WOM was 7.83 (SD 1.65) versus 8.23 (SD 1.41) (F=4.77, p=.030, ηp2=.03).
Perceived responsibility for children's education emerged as an important explanatory mechanism. Attribution scores among participants with children were 6.27 (SD 2.50) in the AI condition and 8.79 (SD 0.86) in the parental-engagement condition (F=87.92, p<.001, ηp2=.36). Mediation analysis showed that attribution significantly mediated the relationship between educational approach and guilt, valuation, and WOM, with effects of 0.6116, -183.9280, and -0.8910, respectively.
Study 3 demonstrated that the reason for choosing AI could alter the pattern of WOM responses. When participants lacked the ability to tutor their children, those using AI educational services reported greater positive WOM than those personally tutoring their children: 7.60 (SD 1.47) versus 6.76 (SD 2.29), p=.006. In the control condition, the pattern was reversed, with WOM scores of 7.36 (SD 1.90) for AI educational services and 7.86 (SD 1.23) for parental engagement (p=.04).
Study 4 found that social conformity also influenced WOM. Overall, WOM was lower with AI educational services than with parental engagement: 7.59 (SD 2.19) versus 8.30 (SD 1.10) (F(1, 396)=17.23, p.001, ηp2=.04). When participants were given information that other parents were using AI educational services, the difference was no longer statistically significant (7.88 [SD 1.94] vs 8.24 [SD 1.23], p=.133). Without such conformity information, WOM was significantly lower for AI educational services (7.29 [SD 2.39] vs 8.36 [SD 0.94], p<.001).
Copyright © Skyscape. All rights reserved.
Source: Shao, A., Lu, Z., Liu, S. Q., et al. Demystifying the mist: Why do individuals hesitate to accept AI educational services?. British Journal of Psychology. 2026; 117(3): 932-956. Published: August, 2026. DOI: 10.1111/bjop.70040.
KEY FINDINGS: As of August 6, 2026, the US had reported 2,465 confirmed measles cases and 38 new outbreaks, with 94% of cases outbreak-associated. The increase occurs alongside a decline in kindergarten MMR coverage to 92.5% in 2024-2025 from 95.2% in 2019-2020. CDC emphasizes that measles can spread rapidly in communities with lower vaccination coverage, while 2 doses of MMR vaccine provide 97% protection against measles.
BACKGROUND: Measles was officially eliminated in the United States in 2000 following widespread use of the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. However, declining vaccination coverage and increasing global measles activity have increased opportunities for measles transmission following importation into the United States.
DETAILS: As of August 6, 2026, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported 2,465 confirmed measles cases in the United States in 2026. Of these, 2,449 cases were reported by 47 jurisdictions, while 16 cases occurred among international visitors to the United States. Thirty-eight new outbreaks had been reported during 2026.
Overall, 94% of confirmed cases in 2026 (2,309 of 2,465) were associated with outbreaks, including 936 cases from outbreaks beginning in 2026 and 1,373 from outbreaks that began in 2025. For comparison, 2,289 confirmed cases and 48 outbreaks were reported during the full year of 2025; 90% of cases (2,066 of 2,289) were outbreak-associated.
CDC reports confirmed measles cases notified by jurisdictions as of noon on Thursdays. An outbreak is defined as 3 or more related cases. State and CDC counts may differ because jurisdictions update and publicly report their data on different schedules.
MMR vaccination coverage among US kindergartners declined from 95.2% during the 2019-2020 school year to 92.5% during the 2024-2025 school year, leaving approximately 286,000 kindergartners at risk during the 2024-2025 school year. CDC notes that communities with vaccination coverage below the 95% level are more vulnerable to measles outbreaks. The 2026 measles case count reported by CDC as of August 6, 2026, had already exceeded the total number of confirmed cases reported during all of 2025 (2,465 vs 2,289). The high proportion of outbreak-associated cases indicates sustained transmission within affected communities.
The burden of measles remains closely associated with vaccination status. CDC reports that 2 doses of MMR vaccine are 97% effective at preventing measles, while 1 dose is 93% effective. Breakthrough infections can occur, particularly during outbreaks with high levels of circulating measles virus, and account for approximately 10% of all measles infections.
Copyright © Skyscape. All rights reserved.
Source: CDC: Measles Cases and Outbreaks. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2026; Published: August 7, 2026.
KEY FINDINGS: This global pediatric surveillance study demonstrates a sustained increase in antimicrobial resistance among children, with the greatest concern involving Gram-negative pathogens, intensive care settings, sepsis cases, and resource-limited regions. Increasing resistance to Watch and Reserve antibiotics may compromise treatment options for severe childhood infections. Forecasted growth in carbapenem resistance among Klebsiella species and Acinetobacter baumannii highlights the need for strengthened antimicrobial stewardship, surveillance systems, and development of effective pediatric treatment strategies.
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) threatens the effectiveness of antibiotic therapy for severe childhood infections, yet comprehensive pediatric AMR surveillance data across multiple regions remain limited. This study evaluated global and temporal patterns of antimicrobial resistance among children using the World Health Organization (WHO) Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) antibiotic classification framework and projected future resistance trends
DETAILS: This cross-sectional surveillance study analyzed pediatric bacterial isolates from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) database collected between January 2004 and December 2022. The study included 106 581 isolates from 106 581 children aged 0 to 18 years across 82 countries. Data were analyzed from February 2024 to April 2026. Resistance trends were assessed by geographic region, age group, clinical setting, infection syndrome, and pathogen type, with spatiotemporal models used to forecast resistance patterns through 2035.
The analysis categorized antibiotics according to the WHO AWaRe framework: Access antibiotics used for first-line treatment, Watch antibiotics with higher resistance potential, and Reserve antibiotics intended for difficult-to-treat infections. The study evaluated WHO priority pathogens and examined resistance patterns among different pediatric populations, including children with sepsis and respiratory infections.
From 2004 to 2022, pediatric AMR increased across all regions, with higher resistance levels and faster increases observed in resource-limited settings. Resistance to Access-group antibiotics was highest overall, with a mean resistance of 36% (range, 2%-66%), compared with Watch-group antibiotics at a mean of 22% (range, 1%-47%) and Reserve-group antibiotics at a mean of 13% (range, 0%-30%).
Resistance to higher-tier antibiotics increased substantially in vulnerable clinical groups. In intensive care units, Watch-group resistance increased from 15% (517/3564) to 33% (2910/8748) (P < .001), particularly among children aged 0 to 2 years, where resistance increased from 12% (325/2649) to 32% (1257/3959) (P < .001). Among children with sepsis, Watch-group resistance increased from 15% (298/2030) to 30% (1409/4705) (P < .001), while Reserve-group resistance increased from 3% (16/474) to 26% (746/2824) (P < .001).
Among critical pathogens, Acinetobacter baumannii demonstrated the highest overall resistance, exceeding 55% in every AWaRe antibiotic category in 2022. Klebsiella species showed the fastest increases in resistance, particularly to third- or fourth-generation cephalosporins and carbapenems. Forecasts estimated that by 2035, carbapenem resistance would reach 35% (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 29%-40%) in Klebsiella species and 82% (95% UI, 77%-85%) in A baumannii.
Copyright © Skyscape. All rights reserved.
Source: Hu, Y. J., Qiu, H., Harwell, J. I., et al. Childhood Antimicrobial Resistance With Global Forecasts. JAMA Pediatrics. 2026; Published: July 20, 2026. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.2808.
KEY FINDINGS: Despite pediatric allocation priority, a substantial proportion of high-quality donor kidneys continues to be allocated to adults with greater priority, predominantly multiorgan transplant recipients. The revised KDPI-8 calculation is not expected to materially alter the proportion of ideal pediatric-quality kidneys prioritized for children, although it changes the clinical composition of the donor pool by increasing the proportion of HCV-seropositive donors and reducing the proportion of donors after circulatory death. These findings highlight persistent limitations of KDPI-based allocation for pediatric candidates and support continued evaluation of policies that balance equity, donor-recipient matching, and long-term transplant outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Children receive allocation priority for deceased-donor kidneys with a kidney donor profile index (KDPI) <35%, although certain adult candidates retain higher priority. The recent transition from the 10-variable KDPI (KDPI-10) to the revised 8-variable KDPI (KDPI-8), which excludes donor race and hepatitis C virus (HCV) status, raised questions regarding its potential effect on pediatric access to high-quality donor kidneys.
DETAILS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 60,587 deceased donors and their kidney recipients recorded in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2023. The investigators compared donor characteristics and kidney allocation patterns using KDPI-10 and KDPI-8. Ideal pediatric-quality donors were defined as donors with a KDPI <35%, donation after brain death, age <35 years, creatinine <=1.5 mg/dL, and no infectious risk, diabetes, or hypertension. Among kidneys from donors with KDPI-10 <35%, 23.4% were allocated to adults in categories with greater priority than pediatric candidates. Among ideal pediatric-quality kidneys, 34.3% were allocated to these higher-priority adult recipients, and 77.5% of these transplants were received by multiorgan transplant recipients. The proportion of donors meeting ideal pediatric-quality criteria was similar with KDPI-10 and KDPI-8 calculations (32.7% vs 33.5%). However, the KDPI-8 group included more Black donors (15.3% vs 9.9%) and HCV-seropositive donors (11.1% vs 3.6%) and fewer donors after circulatory death (12.7% vs 20.3%).
Copyright © Skyscape. All rights reserved.
Source: Sonnenberg, E. M., Amaral, S., Zhang, S., et al. Allocation of Kidney Allografts From Donors With Kidney Donor Profile Index <35% and the Impact of Kidney Donor Profile Index Revisions on Access to Transplantation for Children. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2026; Published: August 22, 2026. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2026.02.643.
Specialty: