FDA Approves Drug to Reduce Bone Marrow Suppression Caused by Chemotherapy

Drug Is Given Before Chemotherapy to Protect Bone Marrow Function

[Posted 15/Feb/2021]

AUDIENCE: Oncology, Internal Medicine

Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Cosela (trilaciclib) as the first therapy in its class to reduce the frequency of chemotherapy-induced bone marrow suppression in adults receiving certain types of chemotherapy for extensive-stage (when the cancer has spread beyond the lungs) small cell lung cancer. Cosela may help protect bone marrow cells from damage caused by chemotherapy by inhibiting cyclin- dependent kinase 4/6, a type of enzyme.

"For patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer, protecting bone marrow function may help make their chemotherapy safer and allow them to complete their course of treatment on time and according to plan,” said Albert Deisseroth, M.D., Ph.D., supervisory medical officer in the Division of Non-Malignant Hematology in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. “Today’s approval of Cosela will give patients a treatment option that can reduce the occurrence of a common, harmful side effect of chemotherapy."

Chemotherapy drugs are designed to kill cancer cells but can damage normal tissues as well. The bone marrow is particularly susceptible to chemotherapy damage. The bone marrow makes red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets (small fragments in the blood) that transport oxygen, fight infection, and stop bleeding. When damaged, the bone marrow produces fewer of these cells, leading to fatigue, increased risk of infection, and bleeding, among other problems. Cosela may help protect the normal bone marrow cells from the harmful effects of chemotherapy.

The effectiveness of Cosela was evaluated in three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. Combined, these studies randomly assigned 245 patients to receive either an infusion of Cosela in their veins or a placebo before chemotherapy. The studies then compared the two groups for the proportion of patients with severe neutropenia (a very low count of white blood cells called neutrophils) and the duration of severe neutropenia in the first cycle of chemotherapy. In all three studies, patients who received Cosela had a lower chance of having severe neutropenia compared to patients who received a placebo. Among those who had severe neutropenia, patients who received Cosela, on average, had it for a shorter time than patients who received a placebo.

The most common side effects of Cosela include fatigue; low levels of calcium, potassium and phosphate; increased levels of an enzyme called aspartate aminotransferase; headache; and infection in the lungs (pneumonia).

Patients should also be advised about injection site reactions, acute drug hypersensitivity, interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis (lung tissue inflammation) and embryo-fetal toxicity.

Cosela received FDA Priority Review and Breakthrough Therapy designations for the indication noted above.

The FDA granted the approval of Cosela to G1 Therapeutics, Inc.

Source: FDA

[Posted 11/Dec/2025]

AUDIENCE: Hematology

KEY FINDINGS: Together with other published data, these findings suggest a model whereby BMP2 and BMP6 can signal to hepcidin induction independently of HJV and HFE and vice versa. In contrast, BMP5, HJV, and HFE are all required for iron-mediated hepcidin regulation in the absence of BMP2 and BMP6.

BACKGROUND: The bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-SMAD signaling pathway is central to regulating hepcidin, the master regulator of systemic iron homeostasis. Authors have previously demonstrated that BMP6, BMP2, and, to a lesser extent, BMP5 are the major ligands contributing to hepcidin and iron homeostasis regulation in vivo.

DETAILS: Hemojuvelin (HJV) and homeostatic iron regulator (HFE) are hepcidin modulators that are mutated in hereditary hemochromatosis. Although both HJV and HFE regulate hepcidin, at least partly, by functionally interacting with the BMP–SMAD pathway, the mechanisms are incompletely understood. Notably, both HJV and HFE can regulate hepcidin in a BMP6-independent manner. To understand whether HJV and HFE influence hepcidin regulation by BMP2 and/or BMP5, authors investigated the iron phenotype of mice with combined mutations in endothelial Bmp2/Hjv and Bmp5/Hfe. Authors found that endothelial Bmp2/Hjv double knockout (KO) mice exhibit more severe hepcidin deficiency and iron overload than single endothelial Bmp2 or Hjv KO mice, similar to previous findings in mice with double endothelial Bmp2/Hfe KO and Bmp6/Hjv KO, or a functional loss of both Bmp6 and Hfe. Moreover, authors found that iron completely fails to induce hepcidin in both endothelial Bmp2/Hjv and Bmp2/Hfe double KO mice. In contrast, a functional loss of BMP5 does not worsen hemochromatosis in Hfe KO mice.

Copyright © Wiley Periodicals LLC. All rights reserved.

Source: Xiao, X., Moschetta, G. A., Chowdhury, S. B., et al. Hemochromatosis Proteins Hemojuvelin and Homeostatic Iron Regulator in Bone Morphogenetic Protein-Mediated Hepcidin Regulation and Iron Homeostasis. American Journal of Hematology. 2025; 100(12): 2175-2184. Published: December, 2025. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.70055.

[Posted 4/Nov/2025]

AUDIENCE: Oncology, Gastroenterology

KEY FINDINGS: In the phase II Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Signature Stratification for Treatment-01 (PASS-01) trial population, PFS was similar between GnP and mFFX; however, OS and safety trends favored GnP. The second-line setting appears inadequate to offer precision choices, given the short survival observed.

BACKGROUND: Goal of this study is to assess modified folinic acid/leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX [mFFX]) versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GnP) in de novo metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and explore predictive biomarkers.

DETAILS: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to mFFX or GnP with exclusion of germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 or PALB2. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) between arms with 0.3 significance. The per-protocol (PP) population included patients who received one dose of chemotherapy. Pretreatment biopsies underwent whole-genome/transcriptome sequencing and patient-derived organoid (PDO) development, providing correlate recommendations at a molecular tumor board and outcomes assessed according to RNA signatures (basal-like v classical). Of 160 patients randomly assigned (80 mFFX, 80 GnP), 140 patients were in the PP population (71 mFFX, 69 GnP), with median follow-up of 8.3 months. The median PFS was 4.0 months for mFFX versus 5.3 months for GnP (hazard ratio [HR], 1.37 [95% CI, 0.97 to 1.92]; P = .069) in intention-to-treat. Median overall survival (OS) was 8.5 months with mFFX and 9.7 months with GnP (HR, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.08 to 2.28]; P = .017). Genomic data were generated in 94%, transcriptomes in 74%, and PDOs in 50%. The median PFS for those with basal-like was 3.0 (mFFX) and 5.5 (GnP) months (P = .17), and classical PDAC was 6.3 (mFFX) versus 5.4 (GnP) months (P = .36). The median OS in basal-like was 7.5 (mFFX) and 8.9 (GnP) months (P = .75) versus in classical OS was 9.7 (mFFX) and 13.9 (GnP) months (P = .047). Overall, 75 (54%) of patients received second-line treatment, 33/75 (44%) correlate-guided. The median time on second-line treatment was only 2.1 months with a median OS of 5.4 months for a correlate-guided choice versus 4.4 months on a standard chemotherapy approach (P = .45).

Copyright © American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Source: Knox, J. J., O'Kane, G., King, D., et al. PASS-01: Randomized Phase II Trial of Modified FOLFIRINOX Versus Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel and Molecular Correlatives for Previously Untreated Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2025; 43(31):3325. Published: November, 2025. DOI: 10.1200/JCO-25-004.

[Posted 27/Oct/2025]

AUDIENCE: Infectious Disease, Microbiologists

KEY FINDINGS: Enhanced antibiotic performance observed in preclinical mouse models. Potential to improve treatment outcomes for multiple intracellular bacterial infections. Ongoing efforts include mechanism elucidation and patent development.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance has severely limited the effectiveness of conventional treatments against persistent bacterial infections. Some pathogens, such as Staphylococcus aureus, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Salmonella enterica, can survive inside immune cells, remaining dormant and shielded from antibiotic action. The increasing prevalence of such infections underscores an urgent need for alternative approaches that do not rely solely on developing stronger antibiotics.

DETAILS: Researchers at the University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, led by Dr. Brian Conlon and Dr. Kuan-Yi Lu, identified a novel small molecule that modifies immune cell behavior to enhance antibiotic performance. Instead of directly targeting bacteria, the molecule reprograms the host's immune cells to activate dormant pathogens, rendering them more susceptible to antibiotic killing.

The team screened approximately 5,000 small molecules through the UNC Small Molecule Screening Core. They used luminescent reporter strains of S. aureus to identify compounds that triggered bacterial activation. The most promising compound was subsequently tested in mouse models, where it significantly improved antibiotic efficacy when administered alongside standard treatments.

In animal models, the selected molecule substantially improved pathogen clearance for S. aureus, M. tuberculosis, and S. enterica when used in combination with existing antibiotics. This finding supports a new therapeutic concept: targeting the host cell environment can potentiate antibiotic activity and overcome intracellular bacterial persistence. The discovery presents an innovative direction for combating infections that evade standard therapy.

Copyright © UNC School of Medicine. All rights reserved.

Source: Conlon, B. and Kuan-Yi, L. UNC Researchers Discover Method to Combat Antibiotic Treatment Failure. UNC Health Newsroom. 2025; Published: October 14, 2025.

[Posted 18/Oct/2025]

AUDIENCE: Ob/Gyn, Family Medicine

KEY FINDINGS: This qualitative study describes Black cisgender women’s perspectives on biopsy as a first-line approach in evaluating abnormal bleeding to rule out endometrial cancer in this population. Authors find that a patient-centered communication approach that incorporates trust-building, shared decision-making, and education may be most successful when recommending biopsy. These findings can inform culturally competent clinical guideline development and public health education to improve timely diagnosis—and ultimately survival—of endometrial cancer among Black women.

BACKGROUND: Black people in the United States with endometrial cancer have a 5-year mortality rate that is more than twice that of White patients. This disparity is driven, in part, by Black individuals’ higher likelihood of advanced-stage diagnosis. Transvaginal ultrasound—as a triage tool for referral to tissue sampling—underperforms among Black women. In this context, tissue sampling as an early step for symptomatic Black patients may improve timely diagnosis of endometrial cancer. Patient acceptability of biopsy as a priority test is necessary to ensure success of this clinical approach. Yet, little is known about the perspective of Black women on biopsy in the diagnostic workup for endometrial cancer.

DETAILS: The goal of this qualitative study was to identify facilitators and barriers to acceptability of a biopsy-first approach to rule out endometrial cancer among cisgender Black women. In this community-engaged qualitative study, 3 focus groups were conducted among cisgender Black women at risk for endometrial cancer. Convenience sampling was carried out using social media and newsletter networks. A focus group guide was developed based on the theory of planned behavior and contained questions about past experiences, initial impressions of a biopsy-first approach, an educational presentation, and final thoughts about a biopsy-first approach. Transcripts of focus group recordings were coded using a combined inductive and deductive approach and analyzed using directed and thematic content analysis. Twenty-five women participated in focus groups, with 6 to 10 participants per group. Participants initially expressed understandable apprehension and rejection of a biopsy-first approach in the context of symptom presentation, informed by concerning past experiences and awareness of medical racism. Yet, by the end of the focus groups, there was overall acceptability of biopsy as a priority test to rule out endometrial cancer. Barriers of biopsy acceptability include negative past experiences, including mismatch of pain expectations with actual experiences, and known incidents of medical racism. Facilitators of biopsy acceptability included fostering patient–provider trust through explicit acknowledgment of medical racism, sharing information, personalized recommendations, and racial concordance in care; and health education about racial disparities in endometrial cancer, the biopsy procedure, physical risks of forgoing biopsy, emotional benefits of biopsy, and the range of possible pain experiences.

Copyright © The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Source: Alson, J. G., Orellana, M., Robinson, W. R., et al. Facilitators and Barriers to Acceptability of a Biopsy-First Approach in the Diagnostic Evaluation for Endometrial Cancer Among Black Women. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology,. 2025; 233(4): 294.e1-294.e11. Published: October, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.03.012.

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

[Posted 17/Oct/2025]

AUDIENCE: Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, Oncology

KEY FINDINGS: ESD is a safe and effective option for managing RNDLs with a low recurrence rate. Adverse events such as postprocedural perianal pain, postprocedural bleeding, and anal stenosis seem to be more common compared with colorectal ESD done for more proximal lesions. However, these can typically be managed conservatively or with minimally invasive endoscopic techniques.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a superior, minimally invasive technique compared with other snare-based endoscopic resection techniques for rectal neoplasms extending to the dentate line (RNDLs). However, performing a successful ESD in the anal canal can be challenging due to vascularity and limited scope stability. In this meta-analysis, we aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ESD for RNDLs.

DETAILS: Authors performed a comprehensive electronic database search from January 2005 through January 2024 for studies evaluating outcomes of ESD performed for managing RNDLs. Pooled proportions were calculated using random-effect models. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 and Q statistics. Data were extracted from 11 studies comprising 496 patients. The pooled en bloc resection rates were 93.60% (95% CI = 90.70-95.70). The pooled R0 resection rate was 80.60% (95% CI = 70.50-87.80). The pooled recurrence rate was 4.00% (95% CI = 2.40-6.50). There was no evidence of significant heterogeneity calculated using the Q test and I2 statistic. The main adverse events were anal pain, postprocedural bleeding, and anal stricture with pooled rates of 20.20% (95% CI = 14.80-26.90), 8.20% (95% CI = 4.70-14.0), and 3.50% (95% CI = 2.10-5.70), respectively.

Copyright © Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Source: Gopakumar, H., Dahiya, D., Draganov, P. V., et al. Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Rectal Neoplasms Extending to the Dentate Line: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 2025; 59(10): 954-963. Published: November/December, 2025. DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000002090.