KEY FINDINGS: Different anticoagulation-related perioperative management strategies achieve different outcomes following elective arthroplasty in patients with therapeutic chronic anticoagulation. There is contradictory evidence regarding the need for the discontinuation of therapeutic warfarin. Retrospective data showed that individual risk stratification with multi-modal prophylaxis resulted in minimal complications.
BACKGROUND: There are currently different management guidelines for patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) that are on long-term anticoagulation. The timing of discontinuation and restarting the anticoagulation is challenging during the postoperative care, which often involves general practitioners and physiotherapists.
DETAILS: The systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and included 3 databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science Core Collection. The risk of bias assessment was performed using the Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) criteria. Six retrospective studies involving 727 patients with therapeutic anticoagulation (1,540 controls) for elective THA, TKA and revision arthroplasty have been included. The follow-up ranged from 30 days to 1 year postoperatively. All studies evaluated outcomes of warfarin therapeutic anticoagulation versus prophylactic dosages of one or more of the following: warfarin, aspirin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated low-dose heparin (UFH). One study did not discontinue therapeutic anticoagulation. Two studies reported no significant differences in complications between groups, whilst 3 studies had significantly higher rates of superficial wound infections, revision surgeries, postoperative haematomas, and prosthetic joint infections (PJI).
Copyright © Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Source: Andronic, D., Andronic, O., Ammann, E., et al. (2024). Outcomes of Different Perioperative Management Strategies of Patients on Chronic Anticoagulation in Elective Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. Family Practice. 2024; 41(5): 629–637. Published: October, 2024. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmae020.
KEY FINDINGS: The use of cPOCUS by non-expert physicians after a short training course appears to be an accurate complementary tool for LVEF assessment in daily practice. Its diffusion in primary care could optimize patient management, without replacing specialist assessment.
BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is the most frequent cardiovascular pathology in primary care. Echocardiography is the gold standard for diagnosis, follow-up, and prognosis of HF. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is of growing interest in daily practice. This study aimed to systematically review the literature to evaluate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment of unselected patients in primary care by non-expert physicians with cardiac POCUS (cPOCUS).
DETAILS: Authors searched in Medline, Embase, and Pubmed up to January 2024 for interventional and non-interventional studies assessing LVEF with cPOCUS in unselected patients with suspected or diagnosed HF in hospital or outpatient settings, performed by non-expert physicians. Forty-two studies were included, involving 6598 patients, of whom 60.2% were outpatients. LVEF was assessed by 351 non-expert physicians after an initial ultrasound training course. The LVEF was mainly assessed by visual estimation (90.2%). The most frequent views were parasternal long/short axis, and apical 4-chamber. The median time of cPOCUS was 8 minutes. A strong agreement was found (κ = 0.72 [0.63; 0.83]) compared to experts when using different types of ultrasound devices (hand-held and standard), and agreement was excellent (κ = 0.84 [0.71; 0.89]) with the same device. Training course combined a median of 4.5 hours for theory and 25 cPOCUS for practice.
Copyright © Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Source: Allimant, P., Guillo, L., Fierling, T., et al. (20245). Point-of-Care Ultrasound to Assess Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Heart Failure in Unselected Patients in Primary Care: A Systematic Review. Family Practice. 2025; 42(2): cmae040. Published: April, 2025. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmae040.
KEY FINDINGS: Authors demonstrate positive effects of holding during TH as evidenced by lower salivary cortisol for both mother and infant and decreased heart rate, respiratory rate, and blood pressure for the infant on day-2. Further research is needed to replicate these results, to understand the lack of infant response on day-3 and to assess correlation with cumulative morphine exposure.
BACKGROUND: The lack of physical contact during therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is challenging for parents of newborns with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. Holding is often avoided due to concerns for effects on infant temperature and for dislodging equipment. Authors assessed the effect of holding during TH on maternal and infant salivary cortisol levels and on infant vital signs.
DETAILS: Prospective crossover study with infants randomized to a 30-minute session of holding on day-2 versus day-3 of TH. "No-holding" occurred on the alternate day at the same time. Pre- and post-holding salivary cortisol levels were compared between holding and no-holding conditions. Vital signs were collected at 2-minute intervals. Data was analyzed using mixed-effects models. Thirty-four mothers and infants were recruited. The median gestational age was 39 weeks, 16 (94%) had moderate encephalopathy and all were on morphine during TH. Salivary cortisol levels decreased after holding for infants on day-2 (P = .02) and mothers on day-2 and day-3 (P = .01). Infants held on day-2, but not on day-3, had lower heart rates, respiratory rates, and mean arterial pressures. Temperature and oxygen saturations were stable on both days.
Copyright © The National Association of Neonatal Nurses. All rights reserved.
Source: Fox, L., Cutler, A., Kaneko-Tarui, T., et al. (20245). A Pilot Randomized Control Trial of Holding During Hypothermia and Effects on Maternal and Infant Salivary Cortisol Levels. Advances in Neonatal Care. 2025; 25(2): 173-180. Published: April, 2025. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000001239.
Results From an Observational Cross-Sectional Multicenter European Study in 17 Countries
[Posted 22/Apr/2025]
AUDIENCE: Dermatology, Family Medicine
KEY FINDINGS: CPG patients have high levels of perceived stress, perceived stigmatization and body dysmorphic, which are partly related to sociodemographic factors like younger age or lower income as well as to other psychological and disease-related factors.
BACKGROUND: Anxiety, depression and suicidal ideation are frequent in patients with chronic prurigo (CPG). Purpose of the study is to analyze perceived stress, stigmatization, body dysmorphia, anxiety, depression and itch-related quality of life in CPG patients and compare them to controls, and then to identify variables/predictors of them. This study is part of a cross-sectional multicenter study in 17 European countries including 5487 consecutive patients and 2808 controls. CPG patients were older than controls and had significantly more comorbidities. However, multivariate analysis allowed controlling for these differences by including them as a covariate.
DETAILS: One hundred twenty-seven individuals with prurigo were included in the analyses. They reported higher levels of stress, stigmatization, and body dysmorphia than controls. In the patient group, stigmatization was associated with higher stress and having a severe disease, stress with younger age and lower income, depression and anxiety with lower income and higher itch intensity, body dysmorphia with younger age, and dissatisfaction with appearance.
Copyright © Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. All rights reserved.
Source: Ficheux, A., Brenaut, E., Schut, C., et al. (20245). Predictors of Perceived Stress, Perceived Stigmatization, and Body Dysmorphia in Patients With Chronic Prurigo/Prurigo Nodularis: Results From an Observational Cross-Sectional Multicenter European Study in 17 Countries. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2025; 92(5): 1056-1063. Published: May, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.12.043.
KEY FINDINGS: In this large national cohort, women who experienced any of 5 major adverse pregnancy outcomes had increased risk for HF up to 46 years later. Women with adverse pregnancy outcomes need early preventive actions and long-term clinical care to reduce the risk of HF.
BACKGROUND: Adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preterm delivery and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, may be associated with higher future risks of heart failure (HF). However, the comparative effects of different adverse pregnancy outcomes on long-term risk of HF, and their potential causality, are unclear. The authors sought to examine 5 major adverse pregnancy outcomes in relation to long-term risk of HF in a large population-based cohort.
DETAILS: A national cohort study was conducted of all 2,201,638 women with a singleton delivery in Sweden in 1973-2015, followed up for HF identified from nationwide outpatient and inpatient diagnoses through 2018. Cox regression was used to compute HRs for HF associated with preterm delivery, small for gestational age, preeclampsia, other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and gestational diabetes, while adjusting for other adverse pregnancy outcomes and maternal factors. Co-sibling analyses assessed for potential confounding by shared familial (genetic or environmental) factors. In 48 million person-years of follow-up, 667,774 women (30%) experienced an adverse pregnancy outcome, and 19,922 women (0.9%) were diagnosed with HF (median age, 61 years). All 5 adverse pregnancy outcomes were independently associated with long-term increased risk of HF. With up to 46 years of follow-up after delivery, adjusted HRs for HF associated with specific adverse pregnancy outcomes were: gestational diabetes, 2.19 (95% CI: 1.95-2.45); preterm delivery, 1.68 (95% CI: 1.61-1.75); other hypertensive disorders, 1.68 (95% CI: 1.48-1.90); preeclampsia, 1.59 (95% CI: 1.53-1.66); and small for gestational age, 1.35 (95% CI: 1.31-1.40). All HRs remained significantly elevated (1.3- to 3.0-fold) even 30 to 46 years after delivery. These findings were only partially explained by shared familial factors. Women with multiple adverse pregnancy outcomes had further increases in risk (eg, up to 46 years after delivery, adjusted HRs associated with 1, 2, or ≥3 adverse pregnancy outcomes were 1.51 [95% CI: 1.47-1.56], 2.31 [95% CI: 2.19-2.45], and 3.18 [95% CI: 2.85-3.56], respectively).
Copyright © American College of Cardiology Foundation. All rights reserved.
Source: Crump, C., Crump, J., and Crump, K. (20245). Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Long-Term Risk of Heart Failure in Women: National Cohort and Co-Sibling Study. J Am Coll Cardiol HF.. 2025; 3(4): 589–598. Published: April, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.11.004.
KEY FINDINGS: Adherence to a sleep-promoting schedule reduced patient sleep interruptions between midnight and 4 am by as much as two-thirds while increasing patients' overall self-perceived sleep quality by 6.7 percentage points. An interprofessional effort to minimize patient interruptions at night in an intensive care unit setting led to improved patient sleep quality and sustainable practice changes.
BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients often experience sleep disruption that fragments their sleep and disturbs their circadian rhythms, putting them at risk for sleep deprivation. The risk increases with greater severity of illness and is especially high in intensive care unit patients. Sleep deprivation can prolong the intensive care unit stay, contribute to emotional and physiological distress, and even increase the patient's risk of death.
DETAILS: Critical care nurses in a 28-bed medical intensive care unit reported that patients often complained of sleep disruption or exhibited emotional and physical distress resulting from sleep deprivation. An analysis of the gap between recommended evidence-based best practice and current practices in the unit revealed numerous opportunities to improve patients' sleep. The aim of this evidence-based quality improvement project was to increase interprofessional adherence to an existing sleep-promoting schedule to reduce avoidable interruptions and improve patient sleep quality. To promote sleep, staff member interactions with patients between midnight and 4 am were minimized, if appropriate. Documented patient encounters and call bell initiation were evaluated as process measures. Patients' self-perceived sleep quality, an outcome measure, was evaluated using the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire.
Copyright © American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. All rights reserved.
Source: Long, K., Hundt, B., Wiencek, C., et al. (2025). Impact of a Sleep-Promoting Schedule on Sleep Quality in the Intensive Care Unit. Crit Care Nurse. 2025; 45(2): 33-40. Published: April, 2025. DOI: 10.4037/ccn2025288.
Specialty: