KEY FINDINGS: Melanoma therapeutics continues to advance with combination adjuvant approaches now investigating anti-PD1 with lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG3), T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT), and individualized neoantigen therapies. How this progress will be integrated into the management of a unique patient to reduce recurrence, limit toxicity, and avoid over-treatment will dominate clinical research and patient care over the next decade.
BACKGROUND: With the development of effective BRAF-targeted and immune-checkpoint immunotherapies for metastatic melanoma, clinical trials are moving these treatments into earlier adjuvant and perioperative settings. BRAF-targeted therapy is a standard of care in resected stage III-IV melanoma, while anti-programmed death-1 (PD1) immunotherapy is now a standard of care option in resected stage IIB through IV disease.
DETAILS: With both modalities, recurrence-free survival and distant-metastasis-free survival are improved by a relative 35-50%, yet no improvement in overall survival has been demonstrated. Neoadjuvant anti-PD1 therapy improves event-free survival by approximately an absolute 23%, although improvements in overall survival have yet to be demonstrated. Understanding which patients are most likely to recur and which are most likely to benefit from treatment is now the highest priority question in the field. Biomarker analyses, such as gene expression profiling of the primary lesion and circulating DNA, are preliminarily exciting as potential biomarkers, though each has drawbacks. As in the setting of metastatic disease, markers that inform positive outcomes include interferon-γ gene expression, PD-L1, and high tumor mutational burden, while negative predictors of outcome include circulating factors such as lactate dehydrogenase, interleukin-8, and C-reactive protein. Integrating and validating these markers into clinically relevant models is thus a high priority.
Copyright © Springer Nature. All rights reserved.
Source: Augustin, R. C. and Luke, J. J. (2024). Rapidly Evolving Pre- and Post-surgical Systemic Treatment of Melanoma. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology. Published: March, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s40257-024-00852-5.
KEY FINDINGS: PDT mediated by MB is an effective and affordable approach for treating FEH associated with HPV in immunosuppressed patients, offering favorable outcomes and improved quality of life.
BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) infections are a major cause of oral lesions, and in individuals living with HIV, lesions such as focal epithelial hyperplasia (FEH) may persist or exhibit atypical features, potentially progressing to more severe conditions if untreated. Managing oral HPV lesions in immunocompromised patients is challenging, as conventional therapies may carry higher risks or show limited efficacy.
DETAILS: This study reports the case of a 49-year-old HIV-positive male with valve disease and arthritis, requiring crutches for mobility. He presented with multiple painless oral lesions, diagnosed as FEH associated with oral HPV, and had previously undergone unsuccessful treatments. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) using methylene blue (MB) and a red laser was proposed as a treatment. Topical MB-mediated PDT successfully cleared the FEH lesions, with no recurrence observed over 24 months.
Copyright © Wiley Periodicals LLC. All rights reserved
Source: de Araújo, J. C., Paiva, H. C., Faara, P. M. M., et al. Long-Term Control of Human Papillomavirus-Related Focal Epithelial Hyperplasia in an Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive Patient Using Methylene Blue-Mediated Photodynamic Therapy. A Case Report. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2026; 58(2): 70-73. Published: February, 2026. DOI: 10.1002/lsm.70091
A Case Series
[Posted 13/Jan/2026]
AUDIENCE: General Surgery, Dermmatology, Internal Medicine
KEY FINDINGS: While hypopigmentation is rare with PSL treatment, it can occur even with conservative low-fluence settings and adequate intervals between sessions. One possible mechanism is thermal beam- stacking, where slow hand movement during treatment may lead to repeated pulses on the same area. This can result in localised thermal accumulation, potentially causing subcellular disruption of melanosomes without overt melanocyte loss. These findings suggest the need for clinician vigilance in monitoring for hypopigmentation, as re-pigmentation may not be achievable. Larger, controlled studies are needed to clarify risk factors and guide safer practice.
BACKGROUND: Picosecond lasers (PSL) are increasingly used for treating melasma, with fewer adverse effects reported compared to Q-switched lasers (QSL). However, the incidence of hypopigmentation following PSL treatment remains unexplored in detail. This case series aims to explore outcomes of hypopigmentation following PSL therapy in patients with melasma, and explore potential contributing factors.
DETAILS: A retrospective chart review identified four patients with hypopigmentation following PSL treatment for melasma, including one referral from another clinic. Across the cohort, 796 patients underwent 3096 sessions between 2021 and 2025. Treatments used 755 and/or 1064-nm wavelengths at low fluences, with intervals of 4–12 weeks. Three in-clinic patients (0.38%, 95% CI 0.13%–1.10%) and one referral developed hypopigmentation. Changes occurred across both wavelengths and beam profiles. Histology demonstrated preserved melanocyte density with reduced melanin pigment and melanosome content. None of the cases showed meaningful re-pigmentation at 6-month follow-up. No cases of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) were observed.
KEY FINDINGS: Both N-NAIL and NAPSI provide accurate cutoff values in a psoriasis population. Therefore, these scoring tools may not only be used to assess severity but also in clinical trials for the inclusion of NP patients in a psoriasis population to create homogeneity between studies. Authors prefer using the N-NAIL, with a cutoff value of 2, because it showed better accuracy compared to the NAPSI.
BACKGROUND: It is challenging to distinguish nail psoriasis (NP) from nonspecific nail changes, contributing to heterogeneity in clinical trials. Existing scoring tools for NP are currently used to assess severity after diagnosis is established. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of two of these severity scoring tools.
DETAILS: A cohort study was conducted with psoriasis patients and matched controls. Fingernails were scored using the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) and the Nijmegen-Nail Psoriasis Activity Index Tool (N-NAIL). To determine their diagnostic properties, cutoff values were established. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated for various cutoff points. The best cutoff value was chosen based on the Youden Index and clinical reasoning. In total, 104 psoriasis patients were included, of which 68 were clinically diagnosed with NP. For the N-NAIL, a cutoff value of 2 showed the best accuracy in the psoriasis population (sensitivity = 83.8% and specificity = 83.3%) and the general population (sensitivity = 83.8% and specificity = 67.3%). For the NAPSI, a cutoff value of 7 showed the best accuracy in the psoriasis population (sensitivity = 80.9% and specificity = 69.4%), while a cutoff value of 10 was optimal in the general population (sensitivity = 72.1% and specificity = 70.2%).
Copyright © John Wiley & Sons Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: Rikken, E. C. C., van Hal, T. W., van den Reek, J. M. P. A., et al. What Is the Diagnostic Capacity of Existing Severity Scoring Tools for Nail Psoriasis? International Journal of Dermatology. 2026; 65(1): 86-92. Published: January, 2026. DOI: 10.1111/ijd.70024.
A Prospective Interventional Study
[Posted 29/Sep/2025]
AUDIENCE: General Surgery, Internal Medicine, Hematology
KEY FINDINGS: Curettage remains optimal for thick, hyperkeratotic SKs, enabling histopathological confirmation. The 532 nm laser, preferred subjectively for convenience, may suit small, non-hyperkeratotic lesions but warrants further validation. Propane-butane cryotherapy offers a cost-effective alternative. The discordance between patient preferences (prioritizing convenience) and clinical efficacy underscores the need for personalized treatment strategies balancing outcomes, tolerability, and cosmetic expectations.
BACKGROUND: Seborrheic keratosis (SK) is the most prevalent benign skin tumor associated with aging, posing esthetic concerns and potential discomfort. The rising demand for cosmetic interventions prompts the exploration of effective removal methods. This study compares three treatment modalities: curettage, 532 nm laser, and propane-butane cryotherapy.
DETAILS: A prospective interventional clinical study was conducted with 30 subjects, treating 123 SK using curettage, 532 nm laser, and propane-butane cryotherapy. Randomized allocation and evaluations at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks were employed. Objective measures included clearance rates (assessed by a dermatologist) and blinded cosmetic ratings by 125 observers. Subjective outcomes encompassed patient-reported pain (VAS), side effects, satisfaction, and preferences. Curettage achieved the highest clearance rate (87.5% vs. laser: 55%, cryotherapy: 50%; p < 0.01). However, patients perceived complete healing most frequently with laser (90% vs. curettage: 87%, cryotherapy: 53%). Despite lower efficacy, 67% favored laser for future treatments, valuing minimal bleeding and no dressings. Observers rated curettage's cosmetic outcomes superior (50% vs. laser: 22.5%). Laser caused the fewest side effects (mean 0.93/lesion) but highest pain (VAS: 4.62 vs. cryotherapy: 3.85). Cryotherapy showed efficacy comparable to laser (50% vs. 55%) but more adverse events.
Copyright © Wiley Periodicals LLC. All rights reserved
Source: Timmermann, V., Krengel, S., Mrowka, P,, et al. (2024). Practical Approaches for Seborrheic Keratosis Treatment: Curettage Versus 532-nm Lithium Borate Laser Versus Cryotherapy: A Prospective Interventional Study. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2025; 57(7): 581-589. Published: September, 2025. DOI: 10.1002/lsm.70042.
Results From the BE BRIGHT Open-Label Extension Trial
[Posted 10/Sep/2025]
AUDIENCE: Dermatology, Family Medicine
KEY FINDINGS: Almost two-thirds of bimekizumab-treated patients achieved and maintained complete skin clearance through 4 years, making bimekizumab an effective, rapid, and durable long-term treatment option.
BACKGROUND: Patients with moderate to severe psoriasis experience significant burden on quality of life. Long-term management with latest-generation biologics can facilitate sustained complete skin clearance and improved patient well-being. Aim of this study is to report 4-year end-of-study bimekizumab efficacy and safety in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.
DETAILS: Data were pooled from 3 phase 3 trials (BE VIVID, BE READY, and BE SURE) and their open-label extension (OLE; BE BRIGHT). Efficacy is reported for patients who received bimekizumab continuously from baseline into the OLE. Safety is reported for patients who received >=1 bimekizumab dose. Seven hundred seventy-one patients received bimekizumab from baseline into the OLE. A high proportion achieved complete skin clearance (100% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) at Week 52 (76.2%) and maintained this to Week 196 (64.7%). The rate of treatment-emergent adverse events over 4 years was 169.8/100 patient-years (N = 1495) and did not increase with longer exposure. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nasopharyngitis, oral candidiasis, and upper respiratory tract infection, consistent with bimekizumab's known safety profile.
Copyright © Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: Blauvelt, A., Langley, R. G., Lebwohl, M., et al. (2024). Bimekizumab Durability of Efficacy Through 196 Weeks and Safety Through 4 Years in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Results From the BE BRIGHT Open-Label Extension Trial. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2025; 93: 644-653. Published: September, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2025.04.038.
Specialty: