Rationale and Design of the OPTIMA-6 Trial.
[Posted 20/Nov/2023]
AUDIENCE: Cardiology, Emergency Medicine
KEY FINDINGS: OPTIMA-6 will reveal the efficacy and safety of a contemporary facilitated PCI with a bolus of half-dose r-SAK in combination with ticagrelor in patients with STEMI.
BACKGROUND: Time to reperfusion is the key to the treatment of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). It is uncertain whether adjunctive thrombolytic therapy combined with contemporary antiplatelet agent ticagrelor improves outcomes as administered prior to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) expected to be performed within 120 minutes.
DETAILS: OPTIMA-6 is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and superiority trial to evaluate the efficacy of a bolus of half-dose recombinant staphylokinase (r-SAK) vs placebo prior to timely primary PCI in patients with STEMI. Enrollment began in April 2023 and is expected to enroll 2,260 patients at approximately 50 centers. Patients with acute STEMI presenting <=12 hours of symptom onset and expected to undergo primary PCI within 120 minutes but more than 30 minutes are to be randomized to a bolus of half-dose r-SAK or placebo. All recruited patients will be mandatory to take aspirin and ticagrelor and receive a bolus of loading dose heparin before the thrombolytic therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint is major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) within 90 days, and the MACE is defined as a composite of all-cause death, reinfarction, unplanned target vessel revascularization, heart failure or cardiogenic shock, and major ventricular arrhythmia. The primary safety endpoints are major bleeding events (BARC 3, 5) within 90 days.
Copyright © Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Source: Li, C., Eikelboom, J. W., Zhong, Z., et al. (2023). Efficacy And Safety Of A Bolus Of Half-Dose r-SAK Prior To Primary PCI In ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Rationale and Design of the OPTIMA-6 Trial. Am Heart J. 2023; 265: 31-39. Published: November, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.06.012.
KEY FINDINGS: Enhanced antibiotic performance observed in preclinical mouse models. Potential to improve treatment outcomes for multiple intracellular bacterial infections. Ongoing efforts include mechanism elucidation and patent development.
BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance has severely limited the effectiveness of conventional treatments against persistent bacterial infections. Some pathogens, such as Staphylococcus aureus, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Salmonella enterica, can survive inside immune cells, remaining dormant and shielded from antibiotic action. The increasing prevalence of such infections underscores an urgent need for alternative approaches that do not rely solely on developing stronger antibiotics.
DETAILS: Researchers at the University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Medicine, led by Dr. Brian Conlon and Dr. Kuan-Yi Lu, identified a novel small molecule that modifies immune cell behavior to enhance antibiotic performance. Instead of directly targeting bacteria, the molecule reprograms the host's immune cells to activate dormant pathogens, rendering them more susceptible to antibiotic killing.
The team screened approximately 5,000 small molecules through the UNC Small Molecule Screening Core. They used luminescent reporter strains of S. aureus to identify compounds that triggered bacterial activation. The most promising compound was subsequently tested in mouse models, where it significantly improved antibiotic efficacy when administered alongside standard treatments.
In animal models, the selected molecule substantially improved pathogen clearance for S. aureus, M. tuberculosis, and S. enterica when used in combination with existing antibiotics. This finding supports a new therapeutic concept: targeting the host cell environment can potentiate antibiotic activity and overcome intracellular bacterial persistence. The discovery presents an innovative direction for combating infections that evade standard therapy.
Copyright © UNC School of Medicine. All rights reserved.
Source: Conlon, B. and Kuan-Yi, L. UNC Researchers Discover Method to Combat Antibiotic Treatment Failure. UNC Health Newsroom. 2025; Published: October 14, 2025.
A Cohort Study Investigating Adherence of Dose and Duration to UK Clinical Guidelines
[Posted 14/Oct/2025]
AUDIENCE: Psychiatry, Family Medicine
KEY FINDINGS: This study highlights how antipsychotic prescribing in dementia is discordant with current NICE guidelines on both duration and dose. More than half of those who discontinued their treatment then restarted treatment. These findings emphasise a persistent gap between clinical guidelines and real-world prescribing, underscoring the need for interventions that prioritise safety and person-centred dementia care.
BACKGROUND: In the UK, it is recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) that if antipsychotics are initiated in people living with dementia, treatment should be at the lowest dose for the shortest time possible (1-3 months). In this study, authors aimed to investigate how dose and duration of antipsychotic medication adhere to UK clinical guidelines and explore treatment restart details in those who stop treatment.
DETAILS: Authors did a retrospective cohort study using longitudinal UK primary care data from the IQVIA Medical Research Database. Authors included people living with dementia aged 60-85 years who received their first antipsychotic prescription between Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2023. Individuals with any previous antipsychotic prescriptions in their records more than 1 year before a dementia diagnosis and those who had missing social deprivation information were excluded from the study. Duration of first and subsequent antipsychotic treatment episodes, medication dosage, and treatment discontinuation and reinitiation rates were investigated. Duration and discontinuation were defined by grouping consecutive prescriptions into treatment episodes using the waiting time distribution method (80% inter-arrival density, 59 days). Daily doses were derived from strength and frequency information and categorised as low or moderate or high based on established minimum effective dose equivalences. People with lived experience of dementia care contributed throughout this project, shaping the research question and advising on interpretation and dissemination strategies. In the dataset search, authors identified 108,910 people with a record indicating dementia at any time. In total, 99,091 cases were excluded (ie, individuals with no antipsychotic prescription between the ages of 60 and 85 years between 2000 and 2023, a previous history of antipsychotics, missing deprivation information, or only one eligible prescription). Authors included 9819 people living with dementia aged 60-85 years who received their first antipsychotic prescription between 2000 and 2023 in the study. 5310 (54.1%) were female and 4509 (45.9%) were male, with a mean age of 77.1 years (SD 5.6 years), and ethnicity data were not available. The first treatment episode lasted a median of 7 months (IQR 6.6-8.7), exceeding NICE guidelines of 1-3 months and 18.1% [95% CI 17.4-18.9]) were initiated on a prescription above the minimum effective dose (ie, low dose). Of the 1781 participants who started on a moderate or high dose, 519 (29.1%) had a moderate or high dose in all quarters of the first year of treatment. 1 year after treatment initiation, 5136 (78.3%) of 6559 eligible individuals remained on medication (48.9% [95% CI 47.7-50.1] on low dose, 14.8% [13.9-15.6] on moderate or high dose of haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine or risperidone; and 14.6% [13.8-15.5] on other antipsychotics). Of the 5547 individuals eligible to restart treatment after initial discontinuation, 3106 (56%) restarted with a median treatment duration of 2.6 months (IQR 0.0-9.9).
Copyright © Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: Smsith, H. C., Petersen, I., Hayes, J. F., et al. (2024). Antipsychotic Prescriptions in People With Dementia in Primary Care: A Cohort Study Investigating Adherence of Dose and Duration to UK Clinical Guidelines. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2025; 12(10): 758-767. Published: October, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(25)00261-5.
KEY FINDINGS: Endovascular treatment for BTK PAD is more often performed in patients with CLTI compared with IC, where it is often combined with an inflow artery intervention or complex lesion crossings. Despite similar procedural success, 1-year MALE is significantly higher in CLTI, driven mainly by over a 2-fold increase in all-cause mortality and major amputations.
BACKGROUND: There are unresolved questions regarding indications and outcomes of endovascular below-the-knee (BTK) interventions in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) in real-world clinical practice. We analyzed 884 patients from the multicenter XLPAD registry between 2006 and 2023 with nonstent BTK PAD interventions. Primary outcome: freedom from major adverse limb events (MALE) at 1 year, a composite of all-cause death, major amputation, or clinically driven revascularization.
DETAILS: Majority (62.8%) of the BTK interventions were performed for chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI), while remaining (37.2%) in patients with intermittent claudication (IC), performed together with an inflow femoropopliteal artery intervention in 58% or involving complex lesion crossings (11.8%). Nearly, 74% were men, mean age 68.0 ± 10.7 years. Mean Rutherford class was 4.65 in CLTI and 2.71 in IC groups. Moderate to severe calcification was present in 25% of cases. Significantly greater number of lesions were treated in the CLTI group (1.84 ± 1.52 vs 2.08 ± 1.61; p = 0.029). Lesion lengths (CLTI: 129.3 ± 85.1 mm vs IC: 115.5 ± 82.5; p = 0.075) were comparable. Nearly, 92% of lesions were treated with balloon angioplasty. Drug-coated balloon use was higher in IC (5% vs 15%, p <0.001), whereas atherectomy use was high in both groups (CLTI: 45.4% vs IC: 49.9%; p = 0.201). Procedural success was similar (CLTI: 92% vs IC: 88.8%; p = 0.098), however 1-year MALE was significantly higher in CLTI patients (30.5% vs 15.8% vs; p <0.0.001), driven by higher all-cause mortality (5.6% vs 2.1% vs; p = 0.014) and major amputations (14% vs 3.7%; p 0.001).
Copyright © Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Source: Rozol, Z. P., Sayfo, S., Fernandez-Vazquez, D., et al. (2025). Indications and Treatment Outcomes of Below-the-Knee Peripheral Artery Interventions in the XLPAD Registry. American Journal of Cardiology. 2025; 251: 38-45. Published: September 15, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.05.011 .
A Randomized Controlled Trial
[Posted 6/Oct/2025]
AUDIENCE: Nephrology, Cardiology, Internal Medicine
KEY FINDINGS:
BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis induces left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMAs) due to myocardial hypoperfusion. Although acute intradialytic exercise (IDE) has shown cardioprotective effects, its routine implementation faces feasibility challenges, and the potential of predialysis exercise as an alternative remains unexplored. This study aimed to compare the effect of predialysis exercise and IDE on hemodialysis-induced myocardial stunning.
DETAILS: In this open-label, randomized cross-over trial, 25 patients with ESKD underwent to each of three hemodialysis conditions, administrated in random order: standard hemodialysis (HD-CONT), hemodialysis with IDE (HD-PER), and hemodialysis preceded by exercise (HD-PER). Two-dimensional echocardiography and whole blood viscosity (WBV) measurements were performed both immediately before hemodialysis onset (T0) and at peak stress of hemodialysis (Tpeak). Left ventricular longitudinal strain from an 18-segment model was used to assess the presence of RWMAs. Regular monitoring of cardiovascular hemodynamics was set up with measurements staggered every 30 minutes. Compared with HD-CONT, there was a significant reduction in RWMAs during both HD-PER (estimated difference, 1.60 segments; 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 3.10; P = 0.04) and HD-PRE (estimated difference, 1.72 segments; 95% confidence interval, 0.21 to 3.22; P = 0.02). The magnitude of the exercise-induced reduction in myocardial stunning did not differ between HD-PER and HD-PRE (P = 0.86). Apart from the exercise period itself, kinetics of all hemodynamic variables were similar between HD-CONT and HD-PER, whereas they were totally similar between HD-CONT and HD-PRE. No associations of changes in RWMAs and hemodynamics variables between HD-CONT versus HD-PRE or HD-PER were found (P > 0.42). Comparing HD-CONT versus HD-PER, WBV was preserved in HD-PER and changes in RWMAs were associated with changes in WBV at high shear rates (225 s-1: P = 0.006; 90 s-1: P = 0.04).
Copyright © American Society of Nephrology. All rights reserved.
Source: Josse, M., Turc-Baron, C., Patrier, L., et al. (2025). Acute Exercise before Dialysis Is as Cardioprotective as during Dialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2025; 20(9): 1236-1246. Published: September, 2025. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.0000000767.
A Retrospective Repeated Cross-Sectional Study
[Posted 3/Oct/2025]
AUDIENCE: Family Medicine, Infectious Disease
KEY FINDINGS: Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older with HIV in the USA were more likely to receive opioid prescriptions and have OUD indicators than matched beneficiaries without HIV. Findings could help guide clinical opioid prescription guidelines and public health surveillance among this vulnerable ageing population.
BACKGROUND: There is longstanding concern that people with HIV receive prescription opioids at higher rates and have a disproportionate burden of opioid use disorder (OUD) compared with their counterparts without HIV. We aimed to evaluate trends of opioid prescriptions and indicators of OUD in an understudied but growing population of older adults with HIV.
DETAILS: For this retrospective repeated cross-sectional study, authors constructed annual cohorts through a nationally representative sample of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older in the USA with Part D coverage (ie, prescription drug) enrolled between Jan 1, 2008, and Dec 31, 2021. Beneficiaries were eligible for inclusion in each cross-sectional cohort if they had reached the age of 65 years by Jan 1 of the calendar year and had 1 year of continuous Medicare enrolment in Part A (inpatient hospital care), B (outpatient care), and D. Beneficiaries with HIV were matched in a 1:3 ratio to beneficiaries without HIV on age, sex, race or ethnicity, US state, and dual eligibility status (Medicare and Medicaid). The main outcomes were receipt of at least one opioid prescription and any indicator of OUD (ie, formal diagnosis, medication for OUD, or opioid-related or emergency department visits) during each calendar year. Generalised estimating equations were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of each outcome, comparing matched beneficiaries with or without HIV. Due to data availability, our analysis of indicators of OUD was restricted to 2008-16. Across all years, 163,429 beneficiaries with HIV and 490,287 beneficiaries without HIV were included (475,516 [72.7%] were male, 178,200 [27.3%] were female; 305,776 [46.8%] were non-Hispanic White, 238,172 [36.4%] were Black [or African American], 84,128 [12.9%] were Hispanic, 8964 [1.4%] were Asian or Pacific Islander, and 16,676 [2.6%] were other races or ethnicities). During 2008-21, 57,373 (35.1%) of 163,429 people with HIV and 138,547 (28.3%) of 490,287 people without HIV received at least one opioid prescription. During 2008-16, 2408 (3.1%) of 76,637 people with HIV and 2831 (1.2%) of 229,911 people without HIV had any indicator of OUD. Across all analysed years, beneficiaries with HIV had significantly increased odds of receiving at least one opioid prescription (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.36-1.39) and having indicators of OUD (2.61, 2.47-2.76) compared with their matched counterparts without HIV.
Copyright © The Author(s). Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: Shiau, S., Drago, F., Kinkade, C. W., et al. (2024). Prescription Opioid Use and Opioid Use Disorder Among Older Adults With HIV in the USA From 2008 to 2021: A Retrospective Repeated Cross-Sectional Study. The Lancet Primary Care. 2025; 1(3): 100017. Published: September, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanprc.2025.100017.
Specialty: